Yes, the bokeh is slightly stronger on the A7iii and yes, the noise is slightly lower at ISO 3600 on a pixel peeper scale.Īlthough I didn't expect a huge sensation, I thought the difference would be much more noticeable.Īnd yes btw, the continuous eye focus is great, but I wouldn't pay the price tag it comes with. Now I'm comparing portraits with A6000/SEL5018 and A7iii/SEL8518 and can hardly see a difference (taking raws and using C1's default settings). Given the fact that A6300 in turn is significantly better than A6000, the difference between A6000 and A7III is simply huge.Īfter using the A6000 for several years, I just got myself an A7iii. Shutter button is non operational in Movie mode.No JPEG quality adjustment in RAW+JPEG.E-shutter setting is global, not saved in custom preset.Back dial is too tiny for comfortable operation in gloves. The eye sensor is not switched off when flipping the display from the camera (not applicable to A6500).Switching off the display requires either wasting a valuable physical button, or digging in menu.Fewer adjustable buttons (A6500 has one extra).It makes your custom buttons quite useless either for video, or for photo. No separate custom button preset for video mode.Probably the most serious disadvantage, shared with A7II, BTW. ![]() ![]() Lack of thumb-stick troubles the AF point/zone adjustment.There's around 1.5 EV difference in low light performance, and also the AF on A7III is significantly better:įinally, A6300/6500 have several ergonomic and usability issues in comparison to 3rd gen of A7: I find the difference between A6300 and A7III huge. I own the A6300 and A7III, and also recently I had an opportunity to test A6000 and A6500 for a day at home.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |